This happened yesterday.
In the entirespeech interview (which is very different, cause the questions often lead down certain paths), she:
In the entire
- mentioned the first hand experience of difficulty in buying a house in Mumbai
- started off with the fact that she considers Muslims safer in India, and that they have a bigger say because of democracy.
- held that the Muslim leadership needed to do more for an image change
- clearly said that Muslims "is allowing itself to listen to the fundamentalists , who actually are not their leaders at all".
- said that there was a gap in understanding the community on the part of those outside it.
Its a rather honest assessment, springing from a bitter first hand experience (not debating whether its true by and large, etc - but its her experience, and she has a right to state it). Its absurd to read any of those points in isolation, as the media have done, and that Mr. V Naidu has promptly pounced upon and denounced as anti-majority, anti-national!!! Pray whats anti-majority/nation in stating one's first hand pain, and reflecting on your own community's problems in addressing issues that impact them ?
I understand the need for sensationalism - but this is twisting things way out context. Way too much.
Disgusting. The media, polity and all of that. So ready to bend anything for their petty PR gains. Yuck.
I understand the need for sensationalism - but this is twisting things way out context. Way too much.
Disgusting. The media, polity and all of that. So ready to bend anything for their petty PR gains. Yuck.
No comments:
Post a Comment